What Makes A Successful Argument - 927 Words

What makes a successful argument? An argumentative essay is similar to any other essay. The writing process may vary, but only slightly to meet the demands of an argument. When writing a convincing argumentative essay, one must first choose a topic and then think about that chosen topic, draft a thesis statement, understand the intended audience, gather evidence, refute opposing arguments, revise the thesis statement, establish credibility, draft the essay, revise the essay, and finally polish the essay. By implementing these steps one is sure to write a convincing argument. When writing an argumentative essay, one must first choose a topic of significance, a topic that the writer has an emotional tie with. The topic is to be tapered down from the unspecific idea. Clichà © topics are to be avoided such as the death penalty and abortion rights. Before beginning the writing process, thinking about the chosen topic is essential. Invention strategies such as freewriting, brainstorming, clustering, and informal outlines are also used to gather further ideas. At this point, a topic is already chosen and a thesis statement is ready to be made. The thesis statement tells the reader what your position on the topic will be. An argumentative thesis is unlike other thesis statements. Instead of stating the topic, an argumentative essays thesis should convey the writers point. The thesis statement should be precise and to the point. It should also show the readers what position willShow MoreRelatedRealists Vs. Scientific Theory930 Words   |  4 Pagesby pointing to the increasing success of science. This requires that there be a reasonable inference from a scientific theory s success to its approximate truth. The argument that realists are trying to make is that the best explanation of a scientific theory s success is that it is true. Larry Laudan refutes the realists argument from the success of science. To do this, he characterize his opposition as Convergent Epistem ological Realism. Convergent realism is a theory about the nature andRead MoreCritique of Rhetorical Appeals in A Call for Unity Essay1075 Words   |  5 PagesA Call for Unity by Carpenter et al. makes use of logos and ethos to create a persuasive and convincing argument. By using these persuasive rhetoric appeals, Carpenter et al. manage to presents themselves and other non-Negro citizens in a favorable light by suggesting that they have expressed understanding (Carpenter et al. 1) and been responsible citizens (2). Negro citizens, however, are presented as opposition determined to undermine the principles of law and order and common sense (2)Read MoreArgument Of Larry Laudan s Pessimistic Meta Induction Essay1444 Words   |  6 Pages This essay examines the argument of Larry Laudan’s Pessimistic Meta Induction (PMI.) The PMI states that due to the history of unsuccessful theories, the theories we currently believe are true most likely aren’t. I argue that the Pessimistic Meta Induction is fallacious, easily proven invalid by realist logic, and inapplicable to modern science. Due to advancements in science, arguments made in the PMI are no longer applicable, and several fallacies can be seen it as well including the turnoverRead MoreThe Future Of Higher Education Depends On Innovation1573 Words   |  7 PagesInnovation† was clearly an argument for change, however, his article also aimed to start a discussion among his readers about the future and what may need to be done to ensure higher education be successful. To help create a discussion in his article, Doss interviewed Rick Beyer, a managing partner at Miles Howland Education Partners, an investment company that’s main focus is o n higher education, and discussed Beyer’s current opinions, as well as his own, on higher education and what they see higher educationRead MoreI.Introduction. Famine Is A Highly Prevalent And Debated1106 Words   |  5 Pagesthat the reasonable and well-thought Peter Singer’s argument is successful. II. Peter Singer’s Argument Peter Singer begins by laying out two basic premises: 1. Suffering and death from lack of food, shelter, and medical care are bad. 2. If one can prevent something bad from happening without sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, one should do it. The first premise does not depend on â€Å"any particular normative ethical theory about what goodness and badness are† (Hensley); i.e. it doesRead MoreOutliers, By Malcolm Gladwell1739 Words   |  7 Pagesexplain the why the person was able to become an outlier or why the event occurred. In his book Gladwell’s argument is that background, birthdate, culture, time period, and hard work are all important in understanding the cause of an event or the success of an individual; he argues this by providing examples, identifying patterns in data, and connecting these together using logic to present his argument to readers. He begins all of his explanations by giving an example of a person or an event and tellingRead MoreExamples Of Political News1151 Words   |  5 PagesDonald Trump becoming the President and what that meant for America. â€Å"The Ingraham Angle† is hosted by Laura Ingraham and on this particular episode she was discussing the consequences that America was facing because of the United States Diversity Visa Program that it offers. While watching these shows I focused on how the hosts uses language while speaking towards their audience, their reasoning process and how they applied it towards their advantage , and what types of evidence that they used in orderRead MoreThe Controversy of Gay Parenting Essay972 Words   |  4 Pagesparenting rights claim that as long as there is a commitment to parenthood then successful parenting is achievable as a homosexual or bi-sexual. Since within a gay couple there is no chance for accidental pregnancy, the couple must make a conscious deci sion to become a parent. People opposed to homosexual parenting argue that homosexual couples are not capable of having long enduring strong relationships required for the successful upbringing of children. They claim it is in the childs best interest toRead Morevicki hearne vs peter singer comparison essay782 Words   |  4 PagesMoral Status†, might indicate Hearne’s argument is stronger due to her strategic and effective use of emotional appeals (i.e. pathos). These appeals allow Hearne to connect quickly and easily with her audience. Hearne is also quite clever in terms of stressing her occupation as an animal trainer. However, after a swift comparison of the two articles, it is evident that Singer’s â€Å"Speciesism and Moral Status† offers readers a stronger and more valid argument. Both Singer and Hearne are arguing theirRead MoreAnalysis Of The Article Why Hominids And Space Go Together Essay1474 Words   |  6 Pages Manned spaceflight is a cr ucial argument in society. Two writers, Seth Shostak and John Logsdon, both believe that America is making a mistake by ending manned space exploration. Seth Shostak is the author of the article â€Å"Why Hominids and Space Go Together† in The New York Times Room for Debate; his article is about how President Obama’s new vision for the NASA program is not a good plan. John Logsdon also wrote an article for The New York Times Room for Debate called â€Å"American Patrimony.† His article